John H. McWhorterThe Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language

Oxford University Press, 2014

by Chris Cummins on July 18, 2014

John H. McWhorter

View on Amazon

[Cross-posted from New Books in Linguistics] The idea that the language we speak influences the way we think – sometimes referred to as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis – has had an interesting history. It’s particularly associated with the idea that languages dismissed as primitive by 19th century thinkers, such as those of indigenous peoples in America and Australia, are not only as rich and complex as European languages (a now uncontroversial point) but also cause their speakers to conceive of reality in fundamentally different and more sophisticated ways.

One problem with this idea, as John McWhorter points out in his new book The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language (Oxford UP, 2014), is that, for there to be ‘winners’, there must also be ‘losers’ – people who are held back by their language. And that’s a much less palatable idea, whether we think that it’s Hopi or English or Chinese speakers that are the ‘losers’. However, McWhorter’s main objection to the Whorfian idea is not that it’s unpalatable, but rather that (as the title of his book suggests) the evidence for it is sketchy. Or, more precisely, although language has been shown to influence cognition in certain ways, none of these are very substantial, and it would be a gross exaggeration to consider that speakers of different languages automatically have different worldviews.

In this interview, we talk about the political dimensions of Whorfianism, and discuss some of the evidence for effects of this kind (and how far they go). We touch upon the way in which claims about it are evaluated by linguists, and how the history of linguistics influences how the idea has developed. And we consider the implications for our own view of the world, if the consequences of language were as profound as has been argued.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Marcin MilkowskiExplaining the Computational Mind

July 15, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Philosophy] The computational theory of mind has its roots in Alan Turing’s development of the basic ideas behind computer programming, specifically the manipulation of symbols according to rules. That idea has been elaborated since in a number of very different ways, but in some form it remains a core idea of [...]

Read the full article →

Elizabeth LunbeckThe Americanization of Narcissism

June 20, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Science, Technology, and Society] “It is a commonplace of social criticism that America has become, over the past half century or so, a nation of narcissists.” From this opening, Elizabeth Lunbeck’s new book proceeds to offer a fascinating narrative of how this came to be, exploring the entwined histories of narcissism, psychoanalysis, and [...]

Read the full article →

Jakob HohwyThe Predictive Mind

June 15, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Philosophy] The prediction error minimization hypothesis is the first grand unified empirical theory about how the brain implements the mind. The hypothesis, which is as bold as it is controversial, proposes to explain the mind via one core mechanism: a process of comparing predicted sensory input with actual input, updating our hypotheses [...]

Read the full article →

Paula A. MichaelsLamaze: An International History

May 16, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in History] The twentieth-century West witnessed a revolution in childbirth. Before that time, most women gave birth at home and were attended by family members and midwives. The process was usually terribly painful for the mother. Beginning in the nineteenth century, however, doctors started to “medicalize” childbirth. Physicians began to think of ways to ease [...]

Read the full article →

Michael StrevensTychomancy: Inferring Probability from Causal Structure

April 15, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Philosophy] When we’re faced with a choice between Door #1, Door #2, and Door #3, how do we infer correctly that there’s an equal chance of the prize being behind any of the doors? How is it that we are generally correct to choose the shorter of two checkout lines in the [...]

Read the full article →

Adrienne MartinHow We Hope: A Moral Psychology

April 1, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Philosophy] From political campaigns to sports stadiums and hospital rooms, the concept of hope is pervasive.  And the story we tend to tell ourselves about hope is that it is intrinsically a good thing — in many ways we still tend to think of hope as a kind of virtue.  Hence we talk about [...]

Read the full article →

Aneta PavlenkoThe Bilingual Mind And What It Tells Us about Language and Thought

March 29, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Language] Big ideas about language often ignore, or abstract away from, the individual’s capacity to learn more than one language. In a world where the majority of human beings are bilingual, is this kind of idealization desirable? Is it useful, or necessary? Aneta Pavlenko‘s book The Bilingual Mind And What It Tells Us [...]

Read the full article →

George E. VaillantTriumphs of Experience: The Men of the Harvard Grant Study

March 27, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Sociology] There are very few studies like the Harvard Grant Study.  Started in 1938, it has been following its approximately 200 participants ever since, analyzing their physical and mental health and assessing which factors are correlated with healthy living and healthy aging.  One of the psychiatrists of the study is George E. Vaillant, [...]

Read the full article →

David EdmondsWould You Kill the Fat Man?

March 1, 2014

[Cross-posted from New Books in Philosophy] The trolley problem is a staple of contemporary moral philosophy.  It centers around two scenarios involving a runaway trolley.  In the first, a trolley is barreling down a track without any brakes; off in the distance five people are tied to the track.  If you do nothing, they will be killed [...]

Read the full article →